What is GREEN (GREEN) crypto coin? The truth behind the eco-friendly crypto that's collapsing

• Jenny Charland
• November 22, 2025 AT 12:07

GREEN is a scam. Period. I saw this coming from a mile away. Zero transparency, zero liquidity, zero future. People are still buying it? 😑

• Dave Sorrell
• November 23, 2025 AT 22:12

If you're looking for real eco-friendly crypto, stick with Cardano, Hedera, or Algorand. They publish their energy metrics, have developer ecosystems, and are listed on major exchanges. GREEN has none of that. Don't confuse marketing with substance.

• stuart white
• November 25, 2025 AT 13:46

Oh wow. Another ‘green’ coin that’s just a shell. The irony is thick enough to choke on. They slap ‘sustainable’ on a project with no code, no team, and no proof - then wonder why it crashes. Greenwashing isn’t innovation, it’s theft. And it’s stealing from people who actually care about the planet.

Cardano uses less energy than your toaster. Hedera’s carbon-negative. Algorand tracks emissions in real time. GREEN? It’s a website built on Wix with a fake Twitter account. The fact that anyone still thinks this is legit is terrifying.

This isn’t crypto. This is a carnival ride with no safety rails. People lose money, then blame the market. But the market didn’t lie - the project did. And now it’s gone. Poof. Like it never existed. Which, honestly, it shouldn’t have.

Why do people fall for this? Because they want to believe. They want to think their investments are doing good. But you don’t save the planet by buying a ticker symbol with zero documentation. You do it by supporting projects that prove their claims.

And if you’re still holding GREEN? Stop. Just stop. Selling at a loss is better than pretending it’ll bounce back. There’s no community. No devs. No roadmap. Just a ghost in a digital graveyard.

Real green crypto doesn’t need hype. It doesn’t need TikTok influencers. It just needs transparency. And GREEN? It’s got none.

The next time someone says ‘green coin,’ ask for the whitepaper. Ask for the energy numbers. Ask for the GitHub. If they can’t answer, walk away. This isn’t investing. It’s gambling with a conscience.

And if you’re one of the few who still believes in this? You’re not just losing money. You’re validating fraud. That’s the real cost.

• Emily Michaelson
• November 26, 2025 AT 09:03

It’s sad how often projects like this prey on people who want to do good. I’ve seen so many investors get burned by ‘eco-friendly’ tokens that turn out to be smoke and mirrors. The worst part? They feel guilty for even considering it - like they failed the planet. But really, the fraudsters failed them.

Green crypto can be real. But it needs accountability. And GREEN? It’s the opposite.

• Caren Potgieter
• November 27, 2025 AT 07:04

Man I feel for anyone who bought this thinking it was helping the earth. I come from South Africa where people are desperate for real solutions to climate change. Fake green projects just make it harder for the real ones to get trust. Please don't fall for this kind of stuff

• David Hardy
• November 27, 2025 AT 07:16

Green = greenwashing. 😅

• Jennifer MacLeod
• November 27, 2025 AT 22:04

Anyone still holding GREEN is just chasing ghosts. Sell. Move on. There are better options out there that actually do what they say

• Linda English
• November 29, 2025 AT 13:54

I understand the allure - the idea of supporting a cryptocurrency that’s genuinely sustainable, that aligns with our values, that doesn’t contribute to the climate crisis - but when a project makes grand claims without offering any verifiable data, without providing transparency around its technology, without even disclosing its energy consumption metrics, it’s not just irresponsible - it’s fundamentally dishonest. And when you combine that with a complete absence of developer activity, no whitepaper, no GitHub, no community, no exchange listings beyond two obscure Korean platforms - it becomes clear that this isn’t a project that failed - it was never a project at all. It was a trap, dressed in green, designed to exploit the hope of well-intentioned people who want to believe in something better. And that, more than anything, is what makes it so dangerous.

Real eco-friendly blockchains like Cardano, Hedera, and Algorand don’t just say they’re green - they prove it. They publish audits. They partner with environmental organizations. They optimize for energy efficiency from the ground up. They have teams of engineers, public roadmaps, and active developer forums. GREEN has none of that. Not even a single line of code. Not a single public commitment. Just a website and a ticker symbol.

And now, after a 98% crash, it’s clear: this was never about sustainability. It was about extraction. It was about taking money from people who care, and leaving them with nothing but a broken wallet and a broken trust. That’s not innovation. That’s predation.

If you own this, please, for your own sake - and for the sake of the movement toward real green crypto - sell it. Don’t wait for a miracle. There won’t be one. The only thing that will rebound is your peace of mind when you finally let go.

And to everyone who still believes in the promise of sustainable blockchain - don’t give up. Just be smarter. Demand proof. Demand transparency. Demand accountability. Because if we stop rewarding fraud, we’ll make space for the real solutions to grow.

• asher malik
• November 29, 2025 AT 23:03

It's funny how we're all so quick to call things scams when they crash... but never ask why they rose in the first place. Who was pumping this? Who had the early supply? And why does no one talk about that? There's a story behind the crash - and it's not just about greed. It's about control. Who owned the tokens? Who sold them first? Who knew this was a house of cards?

Greenwashing? Maybe. But what if it's more than that? What if this was a honeypot - designed to lure in the idealistic, the environmentally conscious, the ones who trust the narrative? And then... poof. All the liquidity vanishes. The devs disappear. The website goes dark. And the only people left holding it are the ones who believed the dream.

It's not just a scam. It's a psychological experiment. And we're all the subjects.

• Matthew Prickett
• November 30, 2025 AT 16:26

Wait - did you know the same people who ran GREEN also launched ‘BLUE’ and ‘PURPLE’? All the same website template. All the same ‘green’ buzzwords. All the same 98% crashes. I’ve been tracking this since 2023. They switch names every time they get caught. They’re not even trying anymore. They’re just harvesting wallets like crops. And the worst part? The same people keep falling for it. Every. Single. Time.

They’re not crypto devs. They’re con artists with Canva accounts.

• Jody Veitch
• December 1, 2025 AT 09:26

It’s pathetic how Americans still fall for this nonsense. We have real innovations in clean energy tech - and instead, people chase tokens with no code and no team. This isn’t crypto. It’s a national embarrassment. The world watches us and thinks we’re all gullible fools. And we are. We are.

• Julissa Patino
• December 2, 2025 AT 19:43

GREEN? More like GREED. I mean come on - no whitepaper? No devs? Zero circulating supply? That’s not a coin, that’s a phishing link with a logo. Why are we even debating this? It’s obvious. Stop wasting time.

• John Borwick
• December 3, 2025 AT 04:19

I’ve seen this pattern too many times. People get excited about ‘green crypto’ because they want to feel like they’re doing good. But real change doesn’t come from buying tokens. It comes from supporting real projects with real teams, real audits, real impact. GREEN didn’t fail because the market turned - it failed because it was never real to begin with. The lesson isn’t about crypto. It’s about trust. Always ask: who’s behind this? What’s the proof? And why should I believe them?

• Omkar Rane
• December 3, 2025 AT 10:39

From India we have so many young people jumping into crypto hoping to make a difference. Projects like GREEN make it harder for real sustainable projects to get noticed. People get burned and then lose faith in the whole idea of green tech. It’s a shame. We need more transparency not less. I hope this post helps someone avoid this trap

• preet kaur
• December 5, 2025 AT 04:09

It’s not just about money - it’s about values. When someone uses the word ‘green’ to sell something that harms trust, they’re not just scamming investors. They’re poisoning the idea of sustainability itself. We need to protect the meaning of ‘eco-friendly’ - not let it become a marketing buzzword for fraud. Thank you for exposing this.

• Daryl Chew
• December 5, 2025 AT 13:51

Did you know the domain grcoin.com was registered under a shell company in the Caymans? And the ‘founder’ listed on the site? He’s a known crypto exit-scammer from 2021. They just reused his identity. This isn’t a coin. It’s a rerun of the same scam with a new name. They’ve done this 7 times now. The SEC knows. They just don’t care until enough people cry.

• David Hardy
• December 6, 2025 AT 05:43

Just sold my last 0.02 GRE. Felt like flushing money down the toilet... but at least I didn’t keep hoping. 🤷‍♂️

• David Hardy
• December 7, 2025 AT 09:38

Same. I bought it thinking it was a hidden gem. Turns out it was just a gem... in a landfill. 😅