Crypto Green Score Calculator
Evaluate cryptocurrencies based on environmental credentials and transparency
How it works
This calculator helps you identify genuine eco-friendly cryptocurrencies by evaluating critical criteria:
- Transparency of technology
- Verified energy usage data
- Environmental certifications
- Developer community activity
- Real-world applications
Result
Example: GREEN (GRE) Cryptocurrency
GREEN (GRE) Evaluation
Score: 17/100
This cryptocurrency failed all key environmental verification criteria:
- No whitepaper or technical documentation
- No public energy usage data
- No environmental certifications
- Listing only on obscure exchanges
- No active developer community
- No real-world applications
RED FLAG The price crashed 98% in 24 hours due to lack of liquidity and trust. This is a clear indicator of a project with no real foundation.
When you hear the word GREEN in crypto, you might think of something clean, sustainable, and future-proof-like a blockchain that actually helps the planet. But the reality of GREEN (ticker: GRE), also known as Greencoin, is far from that promise. This isnât just another altcoin with a green name. Itâs a project with no verifiable tech, no transparent supply, and a price that just crashed 98% in a single day. If youâre wondering whether GREEN is a legitimate eco-friendly crypto or just another ghost project, the answer isnât complicated: itâs dangerously close to a scam.
What is GREEN (GRE) actually supposed to be?
GREEN, or Greencoin, claims to be a cryptocurrency built for sustainability. Its website, grcoin.com, says itâs designed to reduce the environmental damage caused by Bitcoin-style mining. But hereâs the problem: thereâs no proof. No whitepaper. No technical documentation. No GitHub repo. No developer community. No energy usage metrics. None of the things that real blockchain projects publish to prove theyâre doing what they say. Compare that to Cardano, which uses a Proof-of-Stake system proven to use 99.9% less energy than Bitcoin. Or Hedera, which processes transactions at 0.00017 kWh per transaction and is certified carbon-negative. Those projects have public data, third-party audits, and developer tools. GREEN has a website that looks like it was built in 2017 and a Twitter account with no followers.The numbers donât add up-hereâs why
CoinMarketCap lists GREENâs total supply as over 4 billion tokens. But it also says the circulating supply is zero. Thatâs not a glitch. Thatâs a red flag. If no tokens are circulating, how are people trading it? The answer: theyâre not, not really. The few trades that show up are on two tiny Korean exchanges with almost no volume. One user on Reddit said they tried to use the official wallet and the site wouldnât load. The support email bounced back. Then thereâs the price. On October 23, 2025, GREEN dropped 98.11% in 24 hours. That kind of crash doesnât happen because of market trends. It happens when thereâs no liquidity, no demand, and no trust. When a coinâs value can vanish overnight because no oneâs buying, itâs not a currency-itâs a gamble with no odds.Why no one in the industry takes it seriously
The crypto world has standards now. The Crypto Climate Accord has over 200 members, including Ripple and ConsenSys. Theyâre all committed to using 100% renewable energy by 2025. GREEN isnât on that list. The EUâs MiCA regulation now certifies blockchains for ESG compliance. GREEN isnât certified. S&Pâs crypto sustainability index includes 15 verified green blockchains. GREEN isnât one of them. Even the people who study crypto energy use are warning against projects like this. Alex de Vries, founder of Digiconomist, says: âBlockchains claiming green credentials without transparent energy metrics are red flags for investors.â Thatâs exactly what GREEN is-a claim without proof.
How does it compare to real green cryptocurrencies?
| Feature | GREEN (GRE) | Cardano (ADA) | Hedera (HBAR) | Algorand (ALGO) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus Algorithm | Unknown | Proof-of-Stake | Hashgraph (PoS-like) | Pure Proof-of-Stake |
| Energy per Transaction | Not disclosed | 0.0006 kWh | 0.00017 kWh | 0.0002 kWh |
| Market Cap (Oct 2025) | $0.8M (unverified) | $14.2B | $4.7B | $3.1B |
| Circulating Supply | Reported 0 | 34.5B | 36.2B | 13.6B |
| Developer Tools | None | Full SDKs, testnets | 8,500+ devs, SDKs | Algorand Academy, 15K+ certified devs |
| Carbon Verification | No | Yes (via ClimateTrade) | Yes (carbon-negative) | Yes (real-time tracking) |
| Exchange Listings | 2 obscure Korean exchanges | Binance, Coinbase, Kraken | Binance, Kraken, OKX | Binance, Coinbase, KuCoin |
The real danger: fake sustainability
GREEN isnât just useless-itâs harmful. It preys on people who care about the environment and want to invest responsibly. It uses the word âgreenâ to make you feel good, while offering nothing but empty promises. Thatâs not innovation. Thatâs greenwashing. Real eco-friendly crypto projects donât just say theyâre green. They show it. They publish their energy numbers. They get audited. They partner with environmental groups. They build tools for developers. GREEN does none of that.
What should you do if you own GREEN?
If you bought GREEN because you thought it was helping the planet, youâre not alone. But now you know the truth. The coin has no value, no support, and no future. The smartest move isnât to wait for a rebound-itâs to cut your losses and move on. Donât chase it. Donât try to âHODLâ it. Donât believe the few posts online saying âitâs going to 10x.â Those are bots or shill accounts. Thereâs no community behind it. No team. No roadmap. No transparency. Just a ticker symbol and a broken website.What are the real alternatives?
If you want to invest in crypto that actually helps the planet, look at these:- Cardano (ADA) - Uses proof-of-stake, low energy, strong ecosystem funding
- Hedera (HBAR) - Most energy-efficient blockchain, carbon-negative, used by major enterprises
- Algorand (ALGO) - Pure proof-of-stake, real-time carbon tracking, integrates with ClimateTrade
- Solana (SOL) - Fast, low-energy, partnered with WWF for carbon credit tracking
- Energy Web Chain (EWT) - Built for utilities and energy companies, verified renewable energy use
Final verdict: Is GREEN worth anything?
No. Not now. Not ever. Not unless the entire project is rebuilt from scratch-with transparency, accountability, and real engineering. Right now, itâs a ghost coin. A digital mirage. A warning sign. The crypto space is full of scams. But GREEN isnât just a scam-itâs a scam dressed up as a solution. And thatâs the most dangerous kind.Is GREEN (GRE) a real cryptocurrency?
Technically, yes-it exists as a token on some obscure exchanges. But it lacks the core features of a real cryptocurrency: transparent technology, verifiable energy use, developer tools, and community support. Without these, itâs just a digital asset with no foundation.
Why did GREENâs price crash 98%?
The crash happened because there was no real demand or liquidity. Only a handful of trades occurred on two tiny exchanges. When the last buyers pulled out, the price collapsed. This is typical of coins with no backing, no team, and no use case.
Can I mine or stake GREEN?
No. Thereâs no public information about how GREEN works. No staking wallets, no mining software, no consensus algorithm disclosed. You canât stake it because no one knows how to stake it.
Is GREEN listed on Binance or Coinbase?
No. GREEN is not listed on any major exchange. It only appears on two low-volume Korean platforms with minimal trading activity. Major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase have strict listing criteria, and GREEN fails every one of them.
Does GREEN have a whitepaper or technical documentation?
No. The projectâs website, grcoin.com, offers no whitepaper, no technical specs, no code repository, and no developer resources. This level of opacity is a major red flag in crypto, where transparency is the baseline for trust.
Is GREEN environmentally friendly?
There is no evidence to support this claim. Unlike verified green blockchains like Cardano or Hedera, GREEN provides zero data on energy usage, carbon emissions, or sustainability certifications. Claims of being âeco-friendlyâ without proof are misleading and match the definition of greenwashing.
Should I invest in GREEN?
Absolutely not. With no transparency, no liquidity, no team, and no utility, GREEN is a high-risk, zero-reward asset. The 98% price drop isnât a dip-itâs a collapse. Investing in it is gambling with no odds, not crypto investing.
What should I do if I already own GREEN?
If you own GREEN, the best action is to sell it-no matter how little you get back. Holding it wonât make it valuable. Thereâs no roadmap, no development, and no community to support a rebound. Accept the loss and move your funds to a verified, transparent cryptocurrency with real environmental credentials.
GREEN is a scam. Period. I saw this coming from a mile away. Zero transparency, zero liquidity, zero future. People are still buying it? đ
If you're looking for real eco-friendly crypto, stick with Cardano, Hedera, or Algorand. They publish their energy metrics, have developer ecosystems, and are listed on major exchanges. GREEN has none of that. Don't confuse marketing with substance.
Oh wow. Another âgreenâ coin thatâs just a shell. The irony is thick enough to choke on. They slap âsustainableâ on a project with no code, no team, and no proof - then wonder why it crashes. Greenwashing isnât innovation, itâs theft. And itâs stealing from people who actually care about the planet.
Cardano uses less energy than your toaster. Hederaâs carbon-negative. Algorand tracks emissions in real time. GREEN? Itâs a website built on Wix with a fake Twitter account. The fact that anyone still thinks this is legit is terrifying.
This isnât crypto. This is a carnival ride with no safety rails. People lose money, then blame the market. But the market didnât lie - the project did. And now itâs gone. Poof. Like it never existed. Which, honestly, it shouldnât have.
Why do people fall for this? Because they want to believe. They want to think their investments are doing good. But you donât save the planet by buying a ticker symbol with zero documentation. You do it by supporting projects that prove their claims.
And if youâre still holding GREEN? Stop. Just stop. Selling at a loss is better than pretending itâll bounce back. Thereâs no community. No devs. No roadmap. Just a ghost in a digital graveyard.
Real green crypto doesnât need hype. It doesnât need TikTok influencers. It just needs transparency. And GREEN? Itâs got none.
The next time someone says âgreen coin,â ask for the whitepaper. Ask for the energy numbers. Ask for the GitHub. If they canât answer, walk away. This isnât investing. Itâs gambling with a conscience.
And if youâre one of the few who still believes in this? Youâre not just losing money. Youâre validating fraud. Thatâs the real cost.
Itâs sad how often projects like this prey on people who want to do good. Iâve seen so many investors get burned by âeco-friendlyâ tokens that turn out to be smoke and mirrors. The worst part? They feel guilty for even considering it - like they failed the planet. But really, the fraudsters failed them.
Green crypto can be real. But it needs accountability. And GREEN? Itâs the opposite.
Man I feel for anyone who bought this thinking it was helping the earth. I come from South Africa where people are desperate for real solutions to climate change. Fake green projects just make it harder for the real ones to get trust. Please don't fall for this kind of stuff
Green = greenwashing. đ
Anyone still holding GREEN is just chasing ghosts. Sell. Move on. There are better options out there that actually do what they say