Intexcoin (INTX) Viability Checker
Token Viability Assessment
This tool checks if a cryptocurrency token matches characteristics of a dead token like Intexcoin (INTX). Enter key token details to see if it has the same dangerous red flags.
Key Red Flags
- Critical Zero circulating supply
- Critical Exchanges list but don't support withdrawals
- Critical Price discrepancies between exchanges
- Critical No active development or community
Intexcoin (INTX) is not a working cryptocurrency. It’s a ghost. A token that still shows up on exchange listings, has a price quoted in microcents, and claims to be a privacy-focused digital currency - but has zero actual value, zero circulation, and zero activity. If you’re wondering whether to buy, hold, or even look at INTX, the answer is simple: don’t. This isn’t a risky investment. It’s a dead project pretending to be alive.
What Intexcoin Claims to Be
Intexcoin launched in 2016 as an ERC-20 token on the Ethereum blockchain. Its whitepaper promised something appealing: private, fast, low-cost transactions. It said it used advanced cryptography to hide sender and receiver details, making it ideal for cross-border payments where banks charge high fees and take days to process transfers. It sounded like a privacy coin - the kind of thing you’d compare to Monero or Zcash. But here’s the catch: none of those features ever worked. No one has ever verified the privacy tech. No blockchain explorer has shown encrypted transactions. No wallet has successfully sent INTX to an external address. The code behind it? Unverified. The GitHub repo? Last updated in 2017. The team? Anonymous. No names. No LinkedIn profiles. No public statements since 2019.The Reality: Zero Circulating Supply
This is where things get strange - and dangerous. According to CoinMarketCap, Coinbase, and Bitget, the circulating supply of INTX is exactly 0. That means not a single token is in anyone’s wallet outside of exchanges. Yet, you can still trade it on four exchanges. How? No one knows. But here’s what’s happening: exchanges are listing a token that can’t be moved, withdrawn, or used. People are buying it with real money, thinking it’s real - then finding they can’t access it. In November 2023, the price hovered between $0.0000044 and $0.0000049. That’s less than half a cent per million tokens. The total supply is fixed at 600 million INTX, so the fully diluted market cap is about $6,200. For comparison, Monero trades at over $150 per coin with a $2 billion market cap. INTX is less valuable than a cup of coffee in Asheville. And here’s the kicker: the price isn’t even consistent. CoinMarketCap shows one number. Coinbase shows another. That kind of discrepancy doesn’t happen with real markets. It happens when there’s no liquidity, no buyers, no sellers - just bots or fake volume.Trading INTX? You’re Playing Russian Roulette
If you try to buy INTX, you might see a successful transaction on your exchange. You’ll think you own it. But when you try to withdraw it to your MetaMask or Trust Wallet? It fails. Or worse - it shows up as a zero balance. Reddit threads from November 2023 are full of users saying the same thing: "I bought INTX. I can’t send it. I can’t withdraw it. My funds are gone." One user on r/CryptoCurrency spent $10 on Gate.io and couldn’t move it. Another on Trustpilot lost $500 after buying on LBank. The pattern is identical: buy → see balance → try to withdraw → balance vanishes. Binance’s support page explicitly says: "INTX deposits and withdrawals are currently unavailable due to technical issues with the token contract." That’s not a glitch. That’s a tombstone.
No Security, No Audits, No Future
Every legitimate crypto project gets audited. Intexcoin never did. No CertiK. No OpenZeppelin. No PeckShield. The contract address (0x7533a0d5d41c2a3c5b5b7e3b5b5b5b5b5b5b5b520ae2) is listed on CoinMarketCap, but when you check it on Etherscan, the code is incomplete or corrupted. Developers who tried to interact with it got "revert" errors - meaning the contract refuses to execute basic functions like sending tokens. There’s no DeFi integration. No dApps built on it. No merchants accepting it. CoinMap.org doesn’t list a single business that takes INTX. Deloitte’s 2023 survey of 1,200 companies found zero enterprise use of INTX. It’s not just inactive - it’s irrelevant.Why Is It Still Listed?
That’s the real question. Why do exchanges still list a token with zero supply, zero utility, and zero activity? Experts say it’s either a data error - or a scam. Binance’s market integrity team flagged INTX in November 2023 as a "potential market manipulation risk." Stanford’s Dr. Emily Parker called it a textbook case of "tokens reporting zero circulating supply while maintaining exchange listings." That’s not an accident. It’s a red flag. Some exchanges list dead tokens because they don’t have the resources to audit every coin. Others might be quietly letting them stay up to collect listing fees - even if no one’s trading them. Either way, you’re the one who gets hurt.
Just bought INTX last week. Now I can’t withdraw it. My money’s gone. Don’t be me.
Don’t trust any coin that can’t be moved.
I mean, I get it. Exchanges list dead tokens because they don’t want to admit they messed up. It’s easier to pretend it’s still alive than to delete it and look bad. But the fact that people still trade it? That’s the real tragedy. You see a price chart, you think it’s a bargain, you buy in, and then you realize - there’s no one on the other side. No buyers. No sellers. Just a ghost ticker. The contract doesn’t even let you send it. Etherscan shows revert errors. That’s not a bug. That’s a tombstone with a price tag. And now we’ve got Reddit threads full of people saying ‘I lost $500’ like it’s some kind of rite of passage. It’s not a lesson. It’s a scam waiting to happen again. And the worst part? No one’s getting punished. No one’s getting fined. The exchanges just keep listing these things because they make money from listing fees. The users? They’re the ones who get wiped out. And then the next guy comes along, sees the ‘$0.000004’ price, and thinks ‘I can get rich off this.’ No. You can’t. You’re just funding a database error.
Stop feeding the ghost.
They’re not just listing it - they’re *maintaining* it. This is coordinated. The same four exchanges all show the same fake price. The same zero supply. The same silent team. Someone’s running a shell game. The SEC should shut this down. This isn’t crypto. This is financial theater. And the fact that no one’s been charged yet? That’s the real conspiracy. They’re letting this live so they can keep collecting fees while people lose everything. This isn’t negligence. It’s complicity.
And don’t tell me it’s just a ‘mistake.’ Mistakes don’t last seven years.
Let’s break this down properly. First, the token is ERC-20, so it’s built on Ethereum’s infrastructure. That means it should be interoperable with any wallet that supports ERC-20. But the contract code is either incomplete, corrupted, or intentionally blocked - evidenced by revert errors on Etherscan. Second, zero circulating supply means no tokens are held outside exchange wallets. That’s not a liquidity issue - that’s a structural failure. Third, the fact that multiple exchanges report inconsistent prices? That’s not market inefficiency - that’s data manipulation. Fourth, the absence of audits, developer activity, or community engagement since 2019? That’s abandonment. Fifth, the lack of any real-world utility? That’s not ‘early stage’ - that’s ‘never existed.’ So what we’re looking at here isn’t a failed project. It’s a fraud that never even attempted to deliver. The whitepaper was a marketing document. The GitHub was a placeholder. The price chart? A trap. And exchanges are complicit because they profit from listing fees regardless of whether the asset has value. This isn’t crypto. This is a Ponzi of metadata.
And yes, the SEC should be involved. If a token has zero supply and zero utility but still trades, it meets the Howey Test for an unregistered security. Someone needs to get fined. Someone needs to get banned. And everyone who bought INTX? They’re not investors. They’re victims.
It’s wild how easy it is to fool people with a price chart. You see a number, you think ‘cheap,’ you think ‘undervalued,’ you think ‘I’ll buy a little and wait.’ But when the token can’t be moved, it’s not a bargain - it’s a hallucination. The exchanges aren’t even trying to hide it. They just don’t care. They get their fee when you deposit. They get their fee when you trade. They don’t care if you can withdraw. And the worst part? People still fall for it. Every month. Every year. It’s like watching the same horror movie over and over and still screaming when the monster jumps out. We’re not learning. We’re just getting more creative about how we lose money.
INTX isn’t dead. It’s undead. And it’s feeding on our hope.
I’ve seen this before. A token with no supply, no team, no code updates. It’s heartbreaking. People spend their last few hundred dollars thinking it’s their shot. But it’s not. It’s a mirage. I wish someone had told me that when I lost my first crypto. Just walk away. There’s so much real stuff out there. You don’t need to gamble on ghosts.
Be kind to yourself. Don’t chase the dead.
INTX functions as a semiotic void - a signifier with no signified. It occupies the ontological space of a financial instrument while possessing none of its material properties. The market data is performative, not indicative. The price is a phantom variable, generated by algorithmic noise rather than human valuation. The contract, when interrogated, refuses to execute - a performative contradiction. This is not a failed project. It is a meta-project: a critique of market rationality itself. It reveals the fragility of trust in decentralized systems when governance is absent and incentives are misaligned. The exchanges, by maintaining its listing, are not negligent - they are complicit in the epistemic collapse of crypto’s foundational myth: that markets are self-correcting. INTX is the mirror. And we are all staring into it.
And yet… we still buy.
Oh please. Everyone knows this is a pump-and-dump graveyard. But the real question is - who’s behind it? The same people who pushed SQUID and BitConnect? Or is this a new group? The fact that it’s still listed on major exchanges after 7 years? That’s not incompetence. That’s a business model. They list dead coins, collect fees, and let the retail idiots dig their own graves. Meanwhile, the whales? They’ve long since cashed out. The price is fake. The volume is fake. The team? Never existed. And now you’re telling me people still buy this? I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. But I know one thing - if you’re holding INTX, you’re not an investor. You’re a statistic.
bro i read this whole thing and i just feel sad. i know people who lost money on this. they thought it was gonna be big. it’s not. it’s just a name on a screen. don’t trust what you see. check the code. check the team. check if you can send it. if you can’t - walk away. i’m from india, we have so many scams like this. please be careful.